Costs and Finances

 

•  On this page appear answers to the following questions:

1. How have the plans and costs changed since 2004?
2. What is our campaign goal, and is it achievable?
3. Is it a good idea to undertake a capital campaign during a national recession?

 •  Click the chart to the right for a larger version.

 

 

1. How have the plans and costs changed since 2004?

Summary:

  • Changes required by the BAR and BZA resulted in an entirely new plan.
  • Molly Wier hall and the Annex building behind it will be torn down.
  • A new building will be constructed.
  • The building that now houses the church offices will be renovated.
  • The new project will cost $7.2 million.

Discussion:

The plans changed because of requirements by the Board of Zoning Appeals and the Board of Architectural Review.  Originally we intended a new, stand-alone building for $3.2 million to be followed with a $2.4 million renovation of the present educational and fellowship space.  Those projects could have been phased, and we estimated that the total cost would have been $5.6 million. Now, however, we are looking at a more extensive project that requires the demolition of the present Molly Wier Hall and the two-story Annex Building behind it, followed by a construction and renovation project that will approach $7.2 million. Included in the total cost are furnishings for the new building, moving expenses, and the expense of relocating some of our programs to other sites during the interim. [Back to top of page.]


2.  What is our campaign goal, and is it achievable? 

Summary:

  • The goal is $3.6 million in addition to the $3.6 million in pledges and gifts raised in 2004. The total is $7.2 million.
  • The goal is realistic, and there is a specific plan to achieve it.

Discussion:

Our total goal is $7.2 million. In 2004, we raised $3.6 million in pledges and gifts. We therefore need another $3.6 million. And yes, raising that amount is possible; here's why.  The Session has stated that in order to proceed we must have . . .

  • One third of the cost in hand ($2.4 million)
  • One third pledged in hand (2.4 million)
  • One third to be financed and retired through the annual budget ($2.4 million)

As of mid-December 2008, we had more than 1/3 in hand ($2,653,550).  This has been placed in interest-bearing accounts or conservatively invested, and earnings on these funds have largely paid for architectural fees and other costs incurred since 2004.  We have been assured by most contributors that the unpaid amounts pledged in 2004 ($950,000) will soon be received.  That means we have already pledged $1.2 million toward the second 1/3.  We therefore need a minimum of $1.2 million in pledges to complete the second 1/3 and proceed with demolition and construction.

While the Session approved financing the final 1/3 through the annual operations budget, it also unanimously agreed to challenge the congregation to reach for a second $3.6 million in pledges in order to eliminate any need for major long-term financing.  The Session made this decision knowing that our regular and generous givers will continue to give beyond their original pledge, that only 1/3 or our members made any pledge in 2004, and that we have received 365 new members since our last campaign whom we expect to join in the effort.  [Back to top of page.]


3.  Is it a good idea to undertake a capital campaign during a national recession?

Surprisingly, yes.  Although many people find their assets reduced by the current economy, the great benefit is that the costs of material and construction are greatly reduced.  In fact, the total cost of $7.2 million is well below the nearly $9 million which we expected as recently as a year ago. [Back to top of page.]